The FDCPA and the thorny problem of court filings

The last amendment to the FDCPA cleared up the question of whether a Complaint needed the FDCPA required “first communication” language.  However, by failing to exempt all court filed documents from the FDCPA, the thorny question was left as to whether or not “non-pleadings” papers were still required to carry the “mini-Miranda”  The attorney in this Fourth Circuit case was trying to navigate this minefield and was sued for erring on the side of caution.  However, it was a split decision.  Also, if he had failed to include it you can be sure he would have been sued for not having the warning on the papers.  Case here.

Advertisements

About dknights

Attorney, Kentucky
This entry was posted in Legal and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s